JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

BJP Govt in UP Against Education and Democratic Rights, Says Akhilesh Yadav

Former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and Samajwadi Party (SP) president Akhilesh Yadav has strongly criticised the ruling BJP government in Uttar Pradesh, accusing it of being fundamentally opposed to both education and democratic values. Speaking at a public event, he said that the current government is systematically weakening education institutions and suppressing voices that challenge

BJP Govt in UP Against Education and Democratic Rights, Says Akhilesh Yadav

Former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and Samajwadi Party (SP) president Akhilesh Yadav has strongly criticised the ruling BJP government in Uttar Pradesh, accusing it of being fundamentally opposed to both education and democratic values. Speaking at a public event, he said that the current government is systematically weakening education institutions and suppressing voices that challenge it. Yadav alleged that the BJP is more focused on controlling public opinion than on improving the quality of life for the youth through education and employment.

I wanted to write about this because political statements like these often reflect deeper issues affecting society. When a senior leader raises concerns about education and democracy, it is worth examining what’s behind those remarks. Uttar Pradesh, being the most populous state in India, plays a crucial role in national politics. If institutions there are facing setbacks—whether it’s in terms of student protests, teacher appointments, or freedom of expression—it’s something that should concern all of us. Education is not just about books and exams. It’s about preparing the next generation to think critically and participate freely in a democracy. That’s why these kinds of allegations need attention and public discussion.

Akhilesh Yadav’s Allegations Against BJP

During a press meet in Lucknow, Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP-led Uttar Pradesh government of running an anti-education agenda. According to him, key educational reforms have been ignored, and appointments of teachers and university staff are either delayed or misused for political purposes.

He pointed out:

  • Decline in government school enrolments
  • Lack of permanent teaching staff in state universities
  • Frequent cancellation of recruitment exams due to paper leaks
  • Police action on protesting students and teachers

He also criticised the way dissent is being handled, especially on campuses. “Wherever students raise their voice, the government sends police instead of addressing the problem,” he said.

What He Said About Democracy

Akhilesh Yadav didn’t stop at just education. He connected the government’s attitude towards education with what he sees as a larger attack on democracy itself. He said the current regime is intolerant towards public debate and democratic movements.

He gave examples such as:

  • Restrictions on student unions
  • No space for opposition views in state-run universities
  • Denial of permission for peaceful protests
  • Surveillance on activists and academics

He claimed that instead of building a future-ready society, the government is creating fear among students and educators, which directly goes against the values of a healthy democracy.

How Much of This Holds True?

While Akhilesh Yadav is a political opponent, some of the issues he raised are already in the public domain. For instance:

  • The UPPSC paper leak scandal last year affected lakhs of aspirants and drew heavy criticism from all corners.
  • Several university campuses in UP have reported long delays in faculty recruitment, affecting regular classes.
  • Protests by teachers and contractual staff have often been met with police lathicharge or detentions.

These examples suggest that the concerns may not be entirely political posturing.

What Does the Government Say?

So far, there has been no direct response from BJP leaders to these specific allegations by Akhilesh Yadav. However, the UP government has often claimed that it is investing heavily in education infrastructure, such as smart classrooms, digital libraries, and new universities.

But infrastructure alone doesn’t solve everything. The quality of education, timely recruitment, freedom to speak and protest, and ensuring fairness in competitive exams are just as important.

My Take

As someone who closely follows public policy and education reforms, I feel both sides have their points. Yes, the UP government has launched new schemes and built schools. But if issues like paper leaks and teacher vacancies continue, then that progress is incomplete. And if student voices are being crushed, that’s a serious concern in any democracy.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Sustainable Models for Rural Higher Education: A New Way to Fund the Future

India’s rural youth often face a harsh truth—access to quality higher education is limited, expensive, and sometimes not even available in their areas. Even when colleges exist, they suffer from lack of funds, poor infrastructure, and shortage of qualified faculty. In such a setup, expecting rural students to compete equally with their urban peers is

Sustainable Models for Rural Higher Education: A New Way to Fund the Future

India’s rural youth often face a harsh truth—access to quality higher education is limited, expensive, and sometimes not even available in their areas. Even when colleges exist, they suffer from lack of funds, poor infrastructure, and shortage of qualified faculty. In such a setup, expecting rural students to compete equally with their urban peers is unfair. This brings us to a major question: How do we build sustainable models that make rural higher education both accessible and economically viable?

I chose to write about this topic because we cannot ignore rural India when we talk about development. Around 65% of our population still lives in villages. If we truly want India to progress, rural youth must be part of the growth story. Education is their strongest tool, but not if it’s always out of reach or poor in quality. There’s a need to rethink the economics of rural education—from funding to infrastructure to community participation. This article looks at practical ideas and examples of how that reimagining can happen, and why it’s urgent to act now.

Why Rural Higher Education Needs a New Economic Approach

Most government-run rural colleges operate on minimal budgets. They often rely on annual grants that are just enough to cover basic expenses. This leads to a chain reaction:

  • Poor facilities mean students don’t get proper labs, libraries or digital tools.
  • Qualified teachers don’t want to work in rural areas due to low salaries and isolation.
  • Students who can afford to leave the village migrate to cities, widening the rural-urban education gap.
  • Colleges that stay underfunded become outdated, irrelevant or even shut down over time.

Clearly, this old system is not working. We need new models that don’t rely only on yearly government grants or student fees.

Community-Driven Models: Colleges as Local Hubs

One way to make rural colleges sustainable is to turn them into community resource centres. These can serve multiple functions:

  • Provide vocational training to villagers during off-hours
  • Run skill development programmes tied to local industries (like agriculture, weaving, dairy)
  • Partner with local NGOs and SHGs for outreach and social projects
  • Use college infrastructure for village meetings, digital literacy drives, and public health workshops

This way, the college adds value beyond its students and becomes a central part of the local economy. The college can also earn funds through small fees from these services or tie-ups with CSR initiatives of nearby businesses.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in Rural Education

Involving private players doesn’t always mean privatisation. Well-structured PPP models can allow:

  • Private companies to provide infrastructure or digital tools
  • Government to offer regulatory support and basic funding
  • Colleges to function with both accountability and autonomy

For instance, some colleges in Karnataka have partnered with EdTech firms to run online blended learning programmes. The companies provide content and devices, while the college handles classroom support.

PPP models can also be introduced in teacher training, curriculum design and campus development. But for this to succeed, proper checks and transparency mechanisms must be in place.

Digital Infrastructure: A Low-Cost High-Impact Solution

One of the biggest challenges in rural areas is teacher shortage. But with the right digital tools, this gap can be filled. Online lectures, remote mentorship, virtual labs and access to national digital libraries can level the playing field.

  • Low-cost tablets or shared community devices can be provided through government schemes
  • Colleges can join national digital platforms like SWAYAM, DIKSHA, or NPTEL
  • Recorded lectures from reputed professors can supplement weak faculty support

But for this model to work, stable internet and electricity are must-haves. That’s where government infrastructure spending becomes essential.

Funding Models That Actually Work

Rather than giving colleges one-time funding or unpredictable annual budgets, the government can adopt performance-linked funding. For example:

  • Offer base funding plus bonuses for achieving goals like student retention, pass rates or skilling targets
  • Encourage alumni contributions through official donation channels with tax benefits
  • Create community funds where local businesses or panchayats contribute based on what they can afford

Also, higher education bonds or village-level education savings schemes can be introduced where families invest early for their children’s college education.

Real-World Examples

  • Barefoot College (Rajasthan) – It trains rural women, especially grandmothers, to become solar engineers. It’s completely community-run and funded partly by international donors.
  • NAANDI Foundation (Andhra Pradesh) – Works with tribal girls for high-quality school-to-college transition. They offer bridge courses and livelihood support.
  • MGNREGA and education linkage – In some states, local governments are experimenting with combining employment guarantee schemes with infrastructure development in rural colleges.

These are signs that innovation is possible when local knowledge meets national support.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...