Former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and Samajwadi Party (SP) president Akhilesh Yadav has strongly criticised the ruling BJP government in Uttar Pradesh, accusing it of being fundamentally opposed to both education and democratic values. Speaking at a public event, he said that the current government is systematically weakening education institutions and suppressing voices that challenge it. Yadav alleged that the BJP is more focused on controlling public opinion than on improving the quality of life for the youth through education and employment.
I wanted to write about this because political statements like these often reflect deeper issues affecting society. When a senior leader raises concerns about education and democracy, it is worth examining what’s behind those remarks. Uttar Pradesh, being the most populous state in India, plays a crucial role in national politics. If institutions there are facing setbacks—whether it’s in terms of student protests, teacher appointments, or freedom of expression—it’s something that should concern all of us. Education is not just about books and exams. It’s about preparing the next generation to think critically and participate freely in a democracy. That’s why these kinds of allegations need attention and public discussion.
Akhilesh Yadav’s Allegations Against BJP
During a press meet in Lucknow, Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP-led Uttar Pradesh government of running an anti-education agenda. According to him, key educational reforms have been ignored, and appointments of teachers and university staff are either delayed or misused for political purposes.
He pointed out:
- Decline in government school enrolments
- Lack of permanent teaching staff in state universities
- Frequent cancellation of recruitment exams due to paper leaks
- Police action on protesting students and teachers
He also criticised the way dissent is being handled, especially on campuses. “Wherever students raise their voice, the government sends police instead of addressing the problem,” he said.
What He Said About Democracy
Akhilesh Yadav didn’t stop at just education. He connected the government’s attitude towards education with what he sees as a larger attack on democracy itself. He said the current regime is intolerant towards public debate and democratic movements.
He gave examples such as:
- Restrictions on student unions
- No space for opposition views in state-run universities
- Denial of permission for peaceful protests
- Surveillance on activists and academics
He claimed that instead of building a future-ready society, the government is creating fear among students and educators, which directly goes against the values of a healthy democracy.
How Much of This Holds True?
While Akhilesh Yadav is a political opponent, some of the issues he raised are already in the public domain. For instance:
- The UPPSC paper leak scandal last year affected lakhs of aspirants and drew heavy criticism from all corners.
- Several university campuses in UP have reported long delays in faculty recruitment, affecting regular classes.
- Protests by teachers and contractual staff have often been met with police lathicharge or detentions.
These examples suggest that the concerns may not be entirely political posturing.
What Does the Government Say?
So far, there has been no direct response from BJP leaders to these specific allegations by Akhilesh Yadav. However, the UP government has often claimed that it is investing heavily in education infrastructure, such as smart classrooms, digital libraries, and new universities.
But infrastructure alone doesn’t solve everything. The quality of education, timely recruitment, freedom to speak and protest, and ensuring fairness in competitive exams are just as important.
My Take
As someone who closely follows public policy and education reforms, I feel both sides have their points. Yes, the UP government has launched new schemes and built schools. But if issues like paper leaks and teacher vacancies continue, then that progress is incomplete. And if student voices are being crushed, that’s a serious concern in any democracy.