JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

DMK Criticised for Not Joining PM SHRI Scheme – Nainar Nagenthran Questions Tamil Nadu Govt on Quality Education

DMK Criticised for Not Joining PM SHRI Scheme – Nainar Nagenthran Questions Tamil Nadu Govt on Quality Education

BJP State leader Nainar Nagenthran has accused the DMK government of denying Tamil Nadu’s children access to quality education by refusing to join the PM SHRI (Pradhan Mantri Schools for Rising India) scheme launched by the Union Government. He pointed out that even the Kerala Government, led by the Left, has chosen to participate in the initiative, which aims to upgrade schools across India with better facilities and learning standards.

This issue is important because education is a key factor in shaping the future of any society. The PM SHRI scheme focuses on improving infrastructure, teaching quality, and modern learning tools, which could greatly benefit students from government schools. By staying away from this scheme, Tamil Nadu’s ruling government is facing criticism for putting political differences ahead of students’ interests. This debate has become a significant point in the ongoing discussion about education policy in the state.

What the BJP Leader Said

Speaking to the media, Nainar Nagenthran said that the DMK government was “denying free and quality education to children” by not joining the PM SHRI scheme. He compared Tamil Nadu’s stance with that of Kerala, which, despite political differences with the central government, had decided to be a part of the programme. According to him, this shows Kerala’s practical approach towards improving education for its children.

He said the Tamil Nadu government’s refusal to participate in the scheme was politically motivated and not in the best interest of students. Nagenthran argued that the PM SHRI scheme provides funding support and technical guidance from the Centre to create model schools with smart classrooms, digital learning tools, and improved teacher training.

About the PM SHRI Scheme

The PM SHRI Scheme, launched by the Union Ministry of Education, aims to upgrade 14,500 schools across India into modern, model schools showcasing the best practices of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. These schools are meant to act as inspiration hubs for other institutions in their regions.

Key features of the PM SHRI scheme include:

  • Modern classrooms with digital learning support
  • Environment-friendly infrastructure and solar energy usage
  • Training for teachers to implement NEP effectively
  • Emphasis on skill development and experiential learning

By refusing to join, Tamil Nadu is missing the opportunity to access central funding and resources that could directly enhance its school education system.

Political Reactions and Public Response

The BJP has accused the DMK government of putting politics before the welfare of children. Nagenthran said that the Centre’s scheme should not be viewed as a political initiative but as a national effort to raise education standards.

Meanwhile, educationists have also pointed out that participation in such programmes could benefit both rural and urban schools in Tamil Nadu. Some believe that rejecting the scheme might slow down the state’s progress in implementing NEP-related reforms.

Why This Debate Matters

Education remains one of the most sensitive and impactful subjects in governance. With students from government schools depending on state initiatives for quality learning, such political differences can influence the lives of lakhs of children. The argument over the PM SHRI scheme is not just about funding—it reflects the broader struggle between central and state policies in education.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Odisha Government Issues New Attendance Rule: Teachers to Visit Homes if Students Stay Absent for a Week

Odisha Government Issues New Attendance Rule: Teachers to Visit Homes if Students Stay Absent for a Week

The Odisha government has introduced a new attendance-related rule for government and government-aided schools to address the growing concern of student absenteeism. As per a fresh advisory issued by the Directorate of Elementary Education, if a student remains absent from school for seven days or more, teachers will now be required to visit the student’s home and gather details about the reason for absence. The move is aimed at ensuring children do not silently drop out of the education system.

I am writing about this development because it directly affects students, parents, and teachers across the state. School absenteeism often goes unnoticed until it becomes a serious issue, especially in rural and economically weaker areas. This new rule highlights the government’s intent to actively track students and bring them back to classrooms before learning gaps widen. It also puts shared responsibility on schools to stay connected with families, not just within school walls but beyond them.

What the New Advisory Says

The advisory has been issued by the Directorate of Elementary Education and applies to all government and government-aided schools in the state.

Under the new instruction:

  • If a student is absent for one week or more, teachers must visit the student’s home
  • Teachers have to collect information on the reason for absence
  • The details must be properly recorded and reported to higher authorities
  • Schools are expected to take follow-up action to ensure the child returns to school

Why the Odisha Government Took This Step

Student absenteeism has been a persistent challenge, especially after disruptions caused by recent years. Many children stop attending school due to health issues, family responsibilities, migration, or lack of interest, and schools often come to know too late. By making home visits mandatory, the Odisha government aims to identify problems early and prevent dropouts before they become permanent.

Role of Teachers Under the New Rule

Teachers will now play a more active role beyond classroom teaching. During home visits, they are expected to:

  • Understand personal or family issues affecting attendance
  • Counsel parents and students on the importance of regular schooling
  • Encourage re-enrolment and consistent attendance
  • Coordinate with school authorities if additional support is needed

This approach focuses more on guidance and support rather than punishment.

How This Impacts Parents and Students

For parents, the rule sends a clear message that schools are serious about a child’s education. It also opens a direct communication channel between families and teachers. For students, especially those at risk of dropping out, this intervention could act as a timely push to return to school and stay on track academically.

Implementation and Monitoring

School authorities have been instructed to maintain proper records of absentee students and home visits. Block-level and district-level education officers may review compliance to ensure the advisory is being followed in both letter and spirit.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...