JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

How Dr Anita Kanwar’s Leadership Transformed VESASC Through Autonomy and Innovation

How Dr Anita Kanwar’s Leadership Transformed VESASC Through Autonomy and Innovation

Since taking charge in 2018, Dr Anita Kanwar has led Vivekanand Education Society’s College of Arts, Science and Commerce (VESASC) through a period of fast and meaningful change. From securing autonomous status to launching new programmes, strengthening research culture and building strong industry linkages, the college has moved into an ambitious growth phase. Under her leadership, VESASC also became the only institution in Mumbai Suburban to receive the prestigious PM-USHA grant, a milestone that reflects both academic capacity and administrative strength.

For students, teachers and policymakers, the VESASC example offers a grounded understanding of how an institution can adapt to changing expectations. At a time when higher education in India is shifting towards flexibility, skills and innovation, stories like this help us understand what real transformation means on the ground.

Leading the College Through Autonomy

When VESASC became autonomous, the college suddenly had the freedom to rethink its academic structure. Dr Kanwar explains that autonomy allowed the institution to design its own syllabus, introduce new courses quickly and update content based on industry needs. Instead of waiting years for approvals, departments could introduce changes in a matter of months.

Some of the major improvements after autonomy included:

  • More flexibility in curriculum and credit structure
  • Faster introduction of industry-aligned programmes
  • Modernised assessment patterns
  • Hands-on skill development modules
  • Better engagement with visiting faculty from industry

According to faculty members, autonomy not only improved academic quality but also increased student confidence, as they felt the college was preparing them for real careers and not just exams.

Strengthening Research and Innovation

One of Dr Kanwar’s early goals was to boost the college’s research culture. Before 2018, research activity was limited to a few departments. Today, VESASC hosts multiple research cells, faculty development workshops and annual paper presentations.

The college now encourages undergraduate students to work on small projects with guidance from mentors. This shift has led to more publications, collaborations and participation in conferences.

The PM-USHA grant further boosted the research ecosystem. It provided funds for upgrading laboratories, purchasing software, setting up research clusters and expanding facilities for innovation-driven projects.

Expanding Academic Programmes and Opportunities

VESASC has added several programmes over the past few years to match demand from students and employers. These include specialised courses in data science, media studies, finance, psychology and digital technologies.

The expansion was guided by three principles:

  • Practical relevance
  • Demand in the job market
  • Strong linkages with industry experts

Each programme was created after consulting industry partners to ensure students learn skills that companies actually look for. This is one reason the college has seen steady growth in admissions even in competitive areas like Mumbai Suburban.

Industry Partnerships and Skill Development

One of the biggest strengths under Dr Kanwar’s leadership has been industry engagement. The college has signed multiple MOUs with companies for internships, guest lectures, project mentoring and training.

Students now participate in:

  • Industry-led workshops
  • Live projects
  • Certified skill programmes
  • Soft-skill and communication sessions
  • Company visits and interaction with professionals

These activities help bridge the gap between classroom learning and workplace expectations.

Smooth Transition Under the National Education Policy (NEP)

The NEP transition is often challenging for colleges, but VESASC implemented it in a structured and phased manner. Dr Kanwar explains that autonomy helped the college introduce multidisciplinary options, skill-based courses and flexible credit systems.

Under NEP, students can now:

  • Choose from a wider range of electives
  • Build skill credits through short courses
  • Opt for research in the fourth year
  • Complete internships as part of credit requirements

Departments collaborated closely to ensure that students did not feel burdened or confused during the shift.

Leadership Philosophy: Collaboration and Clarity

Throughout the conversation, Dr Kanwar emphasises that transformation does not happen through instructions alone. She believes in teamwork, open communication and involving every department in planning processes.

Her leadership philosophy is built on:

  • Trusting faculty with responsibility
  • Encouraging experimentation
  • Keeping students at the centre of decisions
  • Making processes transparent
  • Ensuring accountability without creating fear

Faculty members say this approach has increased motivation and reduced friction during reforms.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Debate Grows Over Maharashtra Science Fair Prize Hike: Why the Assembly Raised Concerns

Debate Grows Over Maharashtra Science Fair Prize Hike: Why the Assembly Raised Concerns

A debate broke out in the Maharashtra Assembly after School Education Minister Dada Bhuse revealed that the Finance and Planning Department, headed by Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, had raised objections to the sharp increase in prize money for school science fairs. The proposal aimed to raise the top prize from Rs 5,000 to Rs 51,000, but officials expressed concerns that such a steep hike could encourage parents to outsource student projects instead of allowing children to create them independently.

Science fairs are meant to encourage curiosity, creativity and hands-on learning among students. But when prize money becomes unusually high, the focus can shift from learning to winning at any cost. Over the years, teachers and organisers have often noticed that external help and professionally made models sometimes overshadow genuine student work. This debate in the Assembly is important because it brings these concerns into the public space and pushes the government to reconsider how to support students without unintentionally promoting unhealthy competition. Understanding the arguments on both sides helps us reflect on how science education can stay fair and meaningful.

What Led to the Controversy

The School Education Department proposed a substantial increase in prize money for state-level science fairs. The goal was to motivate more students to participate and develop stronger projects. However, when the proposal reached the Finance and Planning Department, it faced objections.

Key concerns raised were:

  • The jump from Rs 5,000 to Rs 51,000 was too large
  • Higher prize amounts might attract unfair external involvement
  • Parents could outsource project work to professionals
  • The original purpose of promoting student-led innovation might get diluted

Minister Dada Bhuse shared these details during the Assembly debate, explaining why the proposal is currently under review.

Why Prize Money Matters in Student Competitions

Science fairs across Maharashtra have traditionally encouraged students to explore concepts in physics, chemistry, biology, robotics and environmental science. Prize money often helps:

  • Recognise outstanding student effort
  • Support further project development
  • Encourage participation from rural and urban schools alike

However, officials also believe that incentives must align with educational goals, not overshadow them.

The Argument Against a Large Prize Hike

The Finance and Planning Department’s objections reflect practical concerns that many educators share. With high-value prizes:

  • Parents may hire experts to create polished models
  • Students who genuinely work on their projects may feel discouraged
  • Competitions may become a comparison of resources rather than creativity
  • The learning experience might reduce to a race for rewards

These concerns were brought up in the Assembly to ensure the prize structure does not compromise fairness.

Arguments Supporting the Increase

On the other side, supporters believe:

  • Higher prize money can inspire students to take science seriously
  • It may encourage participation from economically weaker backgrounds
  • Winning such prizes can motivate students to pursue careers in STEM fields
  • Schools with fewer facilities may use prize money to upgrade labs

The debate is essentially about finding the right balance between motivation and authenticity.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...