JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

How Private Schools Are Forcing Parents to Buy Expensive Textbooks — The Hidden Side of Schooling Costs

How Private Schools Are Forcing Parents to Buy Expensive Textbooks — The Hidden Side of Schooling Costs

Every year, as the new academic session begins, parents across India brace themselves for a financial burden that goes beyond school fees — the purchase of costly textbooks and stationery. In several private schools, parents are being compelled to buy books only from designated shops or school-linked vendors, often at inflated prices. Despite clear government guidelines against such practices, the issue continues to grow quietly, leaving many parents frustrated and helpless.

I chose to write about this topic because it highlights one of the most ignored yet pressing problems in India’s private education system. While schools promise “world-class” education, many have turned education into a business venture, prioritising profits over accessibility. Parents from middle- and lower-income backgrounds are struggling to meet these demands, which adds to their financial stress. What’s worse, those who question these practices fear that their children might face indirect consequences at school. It’s time this issue is discussed openly so that education remains a right, not a luxury.

The Growing Problem of Costly Textbooks in Private Schools

Private schools in many states, including Delhi, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Jammu & Kashmir, have been found selling textbooks that cost two to three times more than standard NCERT editions. Many institutions either refuse to allow parents to buy books from the open market or make it mandatory to purchase from specific vendors tied to the school.

A Class 6 textbook set that should normally cost around ₹1,200 from the NCERT outlet often costs over ₹4,000 when sold through private school channels. Parents are told that “customised” or “integrated” books are being used — but in reality, these are commercial versions of basic subjects like English, Science, and Maths, often produced by private publishers.

Parents Raise Their Voice

Several parent associations have started speaking up against this forced sale of textbooks. In cities like Srinagar and Bhopal, parents have filed complaints alleging that schools are using unfair means to push costly books. Many say they are not given a booklist in advance, leaving them no choice but to buy from the school’s authorised store.

One parent shared, “The school insists on using a particular publisher. When we tried to buy the same books from a local shop, we were told that the school edition is different, and our child will not be allowed to use it.” Such tactics have made parents feel trapped in a system that values profits more than education.

What the Guidelines Say

According to the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and directives from the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), schools are supposed to use NCERT books and are prohibited from forcing parents to buy textbooks or uniforms from a specific shop. The Consumer Protection Act also considers such acts as “unfair trade practices.”

Yet, enforcement remains weak. Education departments often issue notices but fail to follow up with strict penalties. This lack of accountability has encouraged schools to continue exploiting the system year after year.

Why Schools Push Costly Textbooks

Private schools often defend their actions by claiming that books from private publishers are more “interactive” or “updated” compared to NCERT ones. However, many education experts disagree. The real reason, they say, lies in commercial partnerships. Schools receive commissions or incentives from publishers, making it profitable to sell these books directly.

Here’s a quick breakdown of how the system usually works:

  • Schools tie up with private publishers for exclusive curriculum content.
  • Publishers print school logos or “custom editions” to prevent resale in the open market.
  • Parents are directed to specific vendors, ensuring complete control over pricing.

This model ensures maximum profit for both the school and the publisher, while parents bear the cost.

The Financial Burden on Families

For many middle-class and lower-income families, the cost of education is becoming unbearable. In some cases, textbook and uniform costs together exceed the annual tuition fee. This has led to parents taking loans or cutting down on household needs to manage school expenses.

A recent parent survey in Maharashtra revealed that 68% of respondents spent more than ₹10,000 per child just on books and stationery at the start of the session. For families with two or three children, this amount doubles or triples — making private schooling a significant economic strain.

What Needs to Change

Experts and parent associations have suggested several reforms to tackle this problem:

  • Strict monitoring of private school book sales by local education departments
  • Mandatory transparency in booklists, displayed publicly before admissions
  • Penalties for schools found violating CBSE or state norms
  • Encouragement of NCERT and SCERT materials, which are cheaper and standardised
  • Awareness drives for parents to know their rights under education and consumer laws

The Way Forward

The idea of private schooling should not be synonymous with financial exploitation. Education is meant to empower, not to profit from. Schools must remember that they are shaping young minds — not running retail businesses. Parents, too, should feel confident in questioning unfair practices without fear of their children being targeted.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Debate Grows Over Maharashtra Science Fair Prize Hike: Why the Assembly Raised Concerns

Debate Grows Over Maharashtra Science Fair Prize Hike: Why the Assembly Raised Concerns

A debate broke out in the Maharashtra Assembly after School Education Minister Dada Bhuse revealed that the Finance and Planning Department, headed by Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, had raised objections to the sharp increase in prize money for school science fairs. The proposal aimed to raise the top prize from Rs 5,000 to Rs 51,000, but officials expressed concerns that such a steep hike could encourage parents to outsource student projects instead of allowing children to create them independently.

Science fairs are meant to encourage curiosity, creativity and hands-on learning among students. But when prize money becomes unusually high, the focus can shift from learning to winning at any cost. Over the years, teachers and organisers have often noticed that external help and professionally made models sometimes overshadow genuine student work. This debate in the Assembly is important because it brings these concerns into the public space and pushes the government to reconsider how to support students without unintentionally promoting unhealthy competition. Understanding the arguments on both sides helps us reflect on how science education can stay fair and meaningful.

What Led to the Controversy

The School Education Department proposed a substantial increase in prize money for state-level science fairs. The goal was to motivate more students to participate and develop stronger projects. However, when the proposal reached the Finance and Planning Department, it faced objections.

Key concerns raised were:

  • The jump from Rs 5,000 to Rs 51,000 was too large
  • Higher prize amounts might attract unfair external involvement
  • Parents could outsource project work to professionals
  • The original purpose of promoting student-led innovation might get diluted

Minister Dada Bhuse shared these details during the Assembly debate, explaining why the proposal is currently under review.

Why Prize Money Matters in Student Competitions

Science fairs across Maharashtra have traditionally encouraged students to explore concepts in physics, chemistry, biology, robotics and environmental science. Prize money often helps:

  • Recognise outstanding student effort
  • Support further project development
  • Encourage participation from rural and urban schools alike

However, officials also believe that incentives must align with educational goals, not overshadow them.

The Argument Against a Large Prize Hike

The Finance and Planning Department’s objections reflect practical concerns that many educators share. With high-value prizes:

  • Parents may hire experts to create polished models
  • Students who genuinely work on their projects may feel discouraged
  • Competitions may become a comparison of resources rather than creativity
  • The learning experience might reduce to a race for rewards

These concerns were brought up in the Assembly to ensure the prize structure does not compromise fairness.

Arguments Supporting the Increase

On the other side, supporters believe:

  • Higher prize money can inspire students to take science seriously
  • It may encourage participation from economically weaker backgrounds
  • Winning such prizes can motivate students to pursue careers in STEM fields
  • Schools with fewer facilities may use prize money to upgrade labs

The debate is essentially about finding the right balance between motivation and authenticity.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...