JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

India and Bharat Show Sharp Divide on NEP’s Two-Track School Reform

The National Education Policy (NEP) was introduced as a transformative step to bring Indian education in line with global standards. One of its most debated features is the “twin-track” approach that aims to push academic excellence while also promoting vocational and skill-based education. But this vision, while promising on paper, is playing out very differently

India and Bharat Show Sharp Divide on NEP’s Two-Track School Reform

The National Education Policy (NEP) was introduced as a transformative step to bring Indian education in line with global standards. One of its most debated features is the “twin-track” approach that aims to push academic excellence while also promoting vocational and skill-based education. But this vision, while promising on paper, is playing out very differently in urban India and rural Bharat. Where India’s elite schools have the means to adopt the NEP smoothly, many government schools in rural and semi-urban areas are still struggling to meet basic standards.

I decided to write on this topic because education reform impacts every household—urban or rural, rich or poor. And when policies like NEP create uneven results, it’s crucial to talk about how those gaps might grow wider. The divide between ‘India’ and ‘Bharat’ isn’t just about cities and villages anymore—it’s about opportunity, infrastructure, language, and learning outcomes. Understanding this gap can help us question how fair or inclusive any new education system truly is. If the NEP is going to shape our children’s future, we must ask: is it doing that equally for all?

What Does the Twin-Track NEP Model Really Mean?

The NEP promotes a dual approach:

  • Academic excellence through flexibility – More choice in subjects, no rigid science-commerce-art boundaries.
  • Skill and vocational training – Introduces students to coding, crafts, agriculture, and other skills from middle school onwards.

In principle, this is meant to offer well-rounded development and make students future-ready. But in practice, the implementation depends heavily on a school’s infrastructure, teacher training, and available resources.

How ‘India’ Is Embracing It

In cities like Delhi, Bengaluru, and Mumbai, many private schools and central institutions are already experimenting with NEP guidelines:

  • Students can pick elective subjects early
  • Coding, AI, and robotics labs are being set up
  • Teachers receive NEP-aligned training

These schools also have access to digital tools, multilingual content, and project-based learning modules. Urban parents are aware and involved in their child’s educational choices. In short, the top layer of ‘India’ is equipped to handle NEP’s flexibility.

Where ‘Bharat’ Is Left Behind

In contrast, most rural schools—especially in states like Bihar, UP, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha—still struggle with:

  • Shortage of teachers for core subjects, let alone vocational streams
  • Poor or no digital infrastructure
  • Lack of clean classrooms, libraries, and even toilets
  • Medium of instruction mismatched with home language

In many of these schools, even basic classroom learning isn’t stable, so expecting them to offer choice-based learning or career-linked courses feels unrealistic.

Language and Culture Gaps Make It Worse

The NEP promotes mother-tongue instruction in the early years, which is a great idea in theory. But the availability of good quality learning material in regional languages is limited. Also, in aspirational families across Bharat, English is still seen as the passport to better jobs. So, this language policy is clashing with ground-level aspirations, especially in Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns.

Is the System Creating Two Streams of Learners?

This unequal rollout is leading to two very different student outcomes:

  • Urban children are getting exposure to interdisciplinary, flexible education
  • Rural children are still stuck in outdated, textbook-driven systems

In the long run, this could create an even deeper educational divide where students from Bharat are pushed more into vocational streams, while students from India continue on academic tracks. This raises serious questions about fairness and access.

What Can Be Done to Bridge the Gap?

The government, both Centre and State, needs to urgently address these gaps:

  • Massive investment in rural infrastructure, especially for NEP-related upgrades
  • Hiring and training of teachers in both academic and vocational areas
  • Partnerships with edtech companies to deliver digital content in low-resource settings
  • Regular monitoring of NEP implementation, especially in government schools

Only when the NEP is rooted in reality across all regions can it deliver on its promise.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Sustainable Models for Rural Higher Education: A New Way to Fund the Future

India’s rural youth often face a harsh truth—access to quality higher education is limited, expensive, and sometimes not even available in their areas. Even when colleges exist, they suffer from lack of funds, poor infrastructure, and shortage of qualified faculty. In such a setup, expecting rural students to compete equally with their urban peers is

Sustainable Models for Rural Higher Education: A New Way to Fund the Future

India’s rural youth often face a harsh truth—access to quality higher education is limited, expensive, and sometimes not even available in their areas. Even when colleges exist, they suffer from lack of funds, poor infrastructure, and shortage of qualified faculty. In such a setup, expecting rural students to compete equally with their urban peers is unfair. This brings us to a major question: How do we build sustainable models that make rural higher education both accessible and economically viable?

I chose to write about this topic because we cannot ignore rural India when we talk about development. Around 65% of our population still lives in villages. If we truly want India to progress, rural youth must be part of the growth story. Education is their strongest tool, but not if it’s always out of reach or poor in quality. There’s a need to rethink the economics of rural education—from funding to infrastructure to community participation. This article looks at practical ideas and examples of how that reimagining can happen, and why it’s urgent to act now.

Why Rural Higher Education Needs a New Economic Approach

Most government-run rural colleges operate on minimal budgets. They often rely on annual grants that are just enough to cover basic expenses. This leads to a chain reaction:

  • Poor facilities mean students don’t get proper labs, libraries or digital tools.
  • Qualified teachers don’t want to work in rural areas due to low salaries and isolation.
  • Students who can afford to leave the village migrate to cities, widening the rural-urban education gap.
  • Colleges that stay underfunded become outdated, irrelevant or even shut down over time.

Clearly, this old system is not working. We need new models that don’t rely only on yearly government grants or student fees.

Community-Driven Models: Colleges as Local Hubs

One way to make rural colleges sustainable is to turn them into community resource centres. These can serve multiple functions:

  • Provide vocational training to villagers during off-hours
  • Run skill development programmes tied to local industries (like agriculture, weaving, dairy)
  • Partner with local NGOs and SHGs for outreach and social projects
  • Use college infrastructure for village meetings, digital literacy drives, and public health workshops

This way, the college adds value beyond its students and becomes a central part of the local economy. The college can also earn funds through small fees from these services or tie-ups with CSR initiatives of nearby businesses.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in Rural Education

Involving private players doesn’t always mean privatisation. Well-structured PPP models can allow:

  • Private companies to provide infrastructure or digital tools
  • Government to offer regulatory support and basic funding
  • Colleges to function with both accountability and autonomy

For instance, some colleges in Karnataka have partnered with EdTech firms to run online blended learning programmes. The companies provide content and devices, while the college handles classroom support.

PPP models can also be introduced in teacher training, curriculum design and campus development. But for this to succeed, proper checks and transparency mechanisms must be in place.

Digital Infrastructure: A Low-Cost High-Impact Solution

One of the biggest challenges in rural areas is teacher shortage. But with the right digital tools, this gap can be filled. Online lectures, remote mentorship, virtual labs and access to national digital libraries can level the playing field.

  • Low-cost tablets or shared community devices can be provided through government schemes
  • Colleges can join national digital platforms like SWAYAM, DIKSHA, or NPTEL
  • Recorded lectures from reputed professors can supplement weak faculty support

But for this model to work, stable internet and electricity are must-haves. That’s where government infrastructure spending becomes essential.

Funding Models That Actually Work

Rather than giving colleges one-time funding or unpredictable annual budgets, the government can adopt performance-linked funding. For example:

  • Offer base funding plus bonuses for achieving goals like student retention, pass rates or skilling targets
  • Encourage alumni contributions through official donation channels with tax benefits
  • Create community funds where local businesses or panchayats contribute based on what they can afford

Also, higher education bonds or village-level education savings schemes can be introduced where families invest early for their children’s college education.

Real-World Examples

  • Barefoot College (Rajasthan) – It trains rural women, especially grandmothers, to become solar engineers. It’s completely community-run and funded partly by international donors.
  • NAANDI Foundation (Andhra Pradesh) – Works with tribal girls for high-quality school-to-college transition. They offer bridge courses and livelihood support.
  • MGNREGA and education linkage – In some states, local governments are experimenting with combining employment guarantee schemes with infrastructure development in rural colleges.

These are signs that innovation is possible when local knowledge meets national support.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...