JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

Kerala Education Minister’s Bold Idea: Classrooms Without Backbenchers

The traditional idea of “backbenchers” may soon disappear from Kerala’s schools. In a recent statement, Kerala Education Minister V. Sivankutty suggested doing away with the practice of seating students in fixed rows, especially where some are pushed to the back of the classroom. The minister said the new approach will promote equal learning opportunities for

Kerala Education Minister’s Bold Idea: Classrooms Without Backbenchers

The traditional idea of “backbenchers” may soon disappear from Kerala’s schools. In a recent statement, Kerala Education Minister V. Sivankutty suggested doing away with the practice of seating students in fixed rows, especially where some are pushed to the back of the classroom. The minister said the new approach will promote equal learning opportunities for all students and discourage the outdated habit of labelling students based on where they sit.

I chose to write about this because it touches on something we all experienced in school—where we sat in the classroom often became part of our identity. Backbenchers were seen as either naughty or less attentive, while frontbenchers were viewed as serious or teacher’s favourites. But in reality, many bright students sat at the back too. The minister’s idea raises an important conversation: should physical classroom structure affect how we treat or judge students? It’s time to rethink how our classroom setups can either include or isolate children. This move could be a small but meaningful step toward more inclusive and student-friendly learning spaces.

What Is the Minister Proposing Exactly?

Kerala’s Education Minister wants to eliminate the concept of “backbenchers” by changing classroom arrangements. He believes that when students are seated in fixed rows with the same students always pushed to the back, it builds a psychological barrier.

Here are the key highlights of the proposal:

  • Classroom seating should be dynamic, not fixed
  • Teachers must ensure that all students get equal attention
  • Seating arrangements could rotate weekly or monthly
  • Smart classrooms and circular seating can support better interaction

This is not about just shifting seats. It’s about changing the mindset around learning and student potential.

Why This Move Makes Sense

The idea of backbenchers being “less interested” or “troublemakers” is quite old-fashioned. Often, students choose to sit at the back for many reasons—shyness, vision issues, group comfort, or even because of teacher bias in seating arrangements.

Removing this division helps:

  • Reduce classroom hierarchy
  • Make students feel equally valued
  • Improve focus and teacher-student interaction
  • Allow teachers to better identify learning gaps in every student

In fact, many modern schools across the world have already moved towards flexible seating models that encourage open communication and inclusive learning.

What Will Change in Practice?

If implemented well, this idea can lead to:

  • Rotational seating charts that move students around
  • More use of roundtable or U-shaped seating
  • Training teachers to break unconscious biases about front and back rows
  • Changes in how classrooms are designed and monitored

While it may take some effort initially, the long-term results could be improved participation and a healthier academic environment for all.

Are There Any Challenges?

Like any change in education, this idea too may face a few challenges:

  • Not all schools may have space or infrastructure to shift seating models
  • Teachers will need to adjust their classroom management style
  • Students used to fixed peer groups may resist rotation

But with proper planning and teacher support, these hurdles can be managed gradually.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Sustainable Models for Rural Higher Education: A New Way to Fund the Future

India’s rural youth often face a harsh truth—access to quality higher education is limited, expensive, and sometimes not even available in their areas. Even when colleges exist, they suffer from lack of funds, poor infrastructure, and shortage of qualified faculty. In such a setup, expecting rural students to compete equally with their urban peers is

Sustainable Models for Rural Higher Education: A New Way to Fund the Future

India’s rural youth often face a harsh truth—access to quality higher education is limited, expensive, and sometimes not even available in their areas. Even when colleges exist, they suffer from lack of funds, poor infrastructure, and shortage of qualified faculty. In such a setup, expecting rural students to compete equally with their urban peers is unfair. This brings us to a major question: How do we build sustainable models that make rural higher education both accessible and economically viable?

I chose to write about this topic because we cannot ignore rural India when we talk about development. Around 65% of our population still lives in villages. If we truly want India to progress, rural youth must be part of the growth story. Education is their strongest tool, but not if it’s always out of reach or poor in quality. There’s a need to rethink the economics of rural education—from funding to infrastructure to community participation. This article looks at practical ideas and examples of how that reimagining can happen, and why it’s urgent to act now.

Why Rural Higher Education Needs a New Economic Approach

Most government-run rural colleges operate on minimal budgets. They often rely on annual grants that are just enough to cover basic expenses. This leads to a chain reaction:

  • Poor facilities mean students don’t get proper labs, libraries or digital tools.
  • Qualified teachers don’t want to work in rural areas due to low salaries and isolation.
  • Students who can afford to leave the village migrate to cities, widening the rural-urban education gap.
  • Colleges that stay underfunded become outdated, irrelevant or even shut down over time.

Clearly, this old system is not working. We need new models that don’t rely only on yearly government grants or student fees.

Community-Driven Models: Colleges as Local Hubs

One way to make rural colleges sustainable is to turn them into community resource centres. These can serve multiple functions:

  • Provide vocational training to villagers during off-hours
  • Run skill development programmes tied to local industries (like agriculture, weaving, dairy)
  • Partner with local NGOs and SHGs for outreach and social projects
  • Use college infrastructure for village meetings, digital literacy drives, and public health workshops

This way, the college adds value beyond its students and becomes a central part of the local economy. The college can also earn funds through small fees from these services or tie-ups with CSR initiatives of nearby businesses.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in Rural Education

Involving private players doesn’t always mean privatisation. Well-structured PPP models can allow:

  • Private companies to provide infrastructure or digital tools
  • Government to offer regulatory support and basic funding
  • Colleges to function with both accountability and autonomy

For instance, some colleges in Karnataka have partnered with EdTech firms to run online blended learning programmes. The companies provide content and devices, while the college handles classroom support.

PPP models can also be introduced in teacher training, curriculum design and campus development. But for this to succeed, proper checks and transparency mechanisms must be in place.

Digital Infrastructure: A Low-Cost High-Impact Solution

One of the biggest challenges in rural areas is teacher shortage. But with the right digital tools, this gap can be filled. Online lectures, remote mentorship, virtual labs and access to national digital libraries can level the playing field.

  • Low-cost tablets or shared community devices can be provided through government schemes
  • Colleges can join national digital platforms like SWAYAM, DIKSHA, or NPTEL
  • Recorded lectures from reputed professors can supplement weak faculty support

But for this model to work, stable internet and electricity are must-haves. That’s where government infrastructure spending becomes essential.

Funding Models That Actually Work

Rather than giving colleges one-time funding or unpredictable annual budgets, the government can adopt performance-linked funding. For example:

  • Offer base funding plus bonuses for achieving goals like student retention, pass rates or skilling targets
  • Encourage alumni contributions through official donation channels with tax benefits
  • Create community funds where local businesses or panchayats contribute based on what they can afford

Also, higher education bonds or village-level education savings schemes can be introduced where families invest early for their children’s college education.

Real-World Examples

  • Barefoot College (Rajasthan) – It trains rural women, especially grandmothers, to become solar engineers. It’s completely community-run and funded partly by international donors.
  • NAANDI Foundation (Andhra Pradesh) – Works with tribal girls for high-quality school-to-college transition. They offer bridge courses and livelihood support.
  • MGNREGA and education linkage – In some states, local governments are experimenting with combining employment guarantee schemes with infrastructure development in rural colleges.

These are signs that innovation is possible when local knowledge meets national support.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...