JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

Kerala School Removes Backbenches: New Seating Style Gets Attention

Kerala School Removes Backbenches: New Seating Style Gets Attention

A government higher secondary school in Kerala is getting attention for a small but powerful change — it has removed the concept of “backbenchers” by changing how students sit in the classroom. At this school in Ernakulam, traditional straight rows of benches are now replaced with circular or semi-circular seating so that every student faces the teacher directly. The idea behind this move is to break the invisible wall between so-called “frontbenchers” and “backbenchers,” and to make learning more inclusive for all students.

I found this initiative worth sharing because, for decades, the label of “backbencher” has been tied to students who are often left out — whether in academics, attention from teachers, or class participation. Many students get judged not by their effort but by where they sit. This school’s new seating layout challenges that thinking and aims to build equal opportunity for all students in a very visible way. It’s a reminder that even small changes in how we structure learning spaces can lead to better classroom dynamics, improved focus, and higher student confidence.

What Is the New Seating Plan?

The school has removed the fixed idea of rows and back seats. Instead of having students lined up from front to back, the furniture is now arranged in:

  • U-shaped or circular formats
  • Cluster-style seating with groups of 4-6 students
  • No permanent seating assignments

Each setup allows every student to face the blackboard, the teacher, and each other, making the class feel more like a group discussion than a one-way lecture.

Why Remove the Backbenches?

The move is not just about changing furniture — it’s about shifting mindset. Here’s what it aims to fix:

  • Removes social labels: In many schools, “frontbenchers” are seen as bright and serious, while “backbenchers” get labelled as disinterested or weak.
  • Boosts participation: Students who would normally sit in the back now feel more involved in classroom discussions.
  • Helps the teacher: Teachers can interact better with all students when no one is physically or mentally pushed to the margins.
  • Improves visibility and hearing: Every student gets a clear view of the board and can hear the teacher easily, which boosts learning.

What Teachers and Students Say

Teachers at the school say they’ve already noticed changes — quieter students are speaking up more, group learning has improved, and the class feels more united. Students too have shared that they don’t feel judged based on where they sit anymore. Everyone gets equal chance to ask questions and take part in classroom activities.

Could This Work in Other Schools?

Yes, and it doesn’t need a big budget. What this Kerala school did is a low-cost change — just moving around benches and tables. But for it to work in other schools, the mindset has to shift as well. Teachers need to embrace group learning methods, and schools must stop giving fixed labels to students based on seating.

It also opens up the idea of rotating seats regularly so that each student experiences every part of the classroom, whether near the board or closer to windows.

Conclusion

What this Kerala school has done might seem small, but its impact is big. By removing the idea of “backbenchers,” they’ve shown how classrooms can be reimagined to support every student equally. It reminds us that learning doesn’t have to follow old rigid structures — and that sometimes, just changing where a child sits can change how they feel about themselves in school. Other schools across India should take a closer look at this idea and maybe give it a try in their own classrooms.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

CET Cell Plans Fee Hike for Maharashtra Entrance Exams

CET Cell Plans Fee Hike for Maharashtra Entrance Exams

The State Common Entrance Test (CET) Cell in Maharashtra has proposed a revision to the registration fees charged for higher education entrance exams in the state. As per the proposal, students appearing for CET examinations may soon have to pay an additional ₹150 to ₹250. Currently, the application fees vary between ₹500 and ₹1,000, depending on the category and the course. If the proposal is accepted, the revised fee structure will apply to upcoming admission cycles across undergraduate and postgraduate programmes.

Discussing such changes is important because exam fees directly affect lakhs of students who apply for professional courses every year. Many families already spend heavily on coaching, travel, and study materials before even entering college. When an institution proposes a fee hike, it becomes necessary to evaluate whether the additional charges will improve exam administration, technology use, grievance redressal, or simply increase the financial burden.

Students from rural areas and financially weaker backgrounds may find even a small increase challenging. On the other hand, education authorities argue that operational costs have risen significantly due to digital infrastructure, manpower, and exam security measures. As a result, it is essential to understand the reasons behind this proposal and its potential impact on access to higher education.

What Will the New CET Fee Structure Look Like?

  • Current fee range: ₹500–₹1,000
  • Proposed increase: ₹150–₹250
  • New expected fee range: ₹650–₹1,250

The revised fees may be applicable to exams such as:

  • MHT-CET (Engineering and Pharmacy)
  • MBA/MMS CET
  • LAW CET
  • B.Ed., M.Ed., and B.P.Ed admissions
  • MCA, M.Arch, and other professional courses offered in Maharashtra

Why is the CET Cell Proposing the Fee Hike?

According to officials, several factors have led to rising examination expenditure:

  • Increasing use of digital platforms for secure registration and results
  • Higher costs for exam centres, invigilation, technical staff and logistics
  • Implementation of stricter anti-malpractice measures
  • Maintenance of online help desks and grievance systems

The CET Cell claims that the existing fee structure does not adequately cover examination expenses.

Concerns Raised by Students

Many students feel that a fee increase, even if small, could affect affordability:

  • Students from low-income families may struggle to pay higher fees
  • Multiple exam applications make the cost even higher
  • Rural students already spend on travel and internet facilities

Several education activists believe that instead of increasing fees, the state should offer subsidies or concessions to economically weaker students.

Will There Be Concessions for Reserved Categories?

Although the proposal does not mention separate concessions yet, it is likely that:

  • Reserved category students may receive reduced fees
  • Economically weaker sections might get partial exemption
  • Special relief may continue for differently abled students

The final decision will depend on government approval.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...