JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

St Stephen’s College Faces Questions Over Separate Fee Collection from DU Students

St Stephen’s College Faces Questions Over Separate Fee Collection from DU Students

St Stephen’s College, one of Delhi University’s most reputed institutions, has come under scrutiny after reports surfaced that it directed first-year students to pay university and college fees separately. According to The Times of India, the college’s fee notice required students to submit a “DU fee” ranging from ₹11,551 to ₹11,630 for most undergraduate courses, even though the official university fee stands at just ₹3,500 per year. This has effectively led to an overcharge of around ₹8,000 per student — amounting to nearly ₹32 lakh in excess collection from approximately 400 first-year students. The decision to bypass Delhi University’s single-portal payment system has raised concerns about transparency and adherence to university norms.

I wanted to write about this issue because it highlights the growing tension between autonomous colleges and central universities over financial and administrative control. St Stephen’s has often been in the news for exercising autonomy in its admission process, and this latest controversy once again brings the college’s independent practices under public debate. For students and parents, clarity on fee structures and payment systems is crucial, especially at a time when higher education costs are rising across India. Understanding why such disputes occur helps shed light on larger questions — about regulation, institutional accountability, and the balance between autonomy and fairness in India’s public education system.

What Happened at St Stephen’s College

As per media reports, St Stephen’s issued a fee notice asking students to make two separate payments — one for the college and another for the university. This directive goes against Delhi University’s recent instruction that all affiliated colleges must collect fees through a unified payment portal to ensure uniformity and prevent overcharging.

The controversy deepened when the details of the “DU fee” component came to light. Instead of the official ₹3,500 annual charge mandated by Delhi University, St Stephen’s listed an amount exceeding ₹11,500. The difference — over ₹8,000 per student — has raised serious questions about the purpose of the additional sum and whether it was collected without authorisation.

If reports are accurate, this would mean that St Stephen’s collected nearly ₹32 lakh more than the university-approved amount from its first-year batch alone.

Delhi University’s Stand on the Issue

Sources within Delhi University have reportedly expressed concern over the matter. The university has a single-portal payment mechanism in place to maintain transparency and standardisation across its affiliated colleges. By asking students to pay separately, St Stephen’s appears to have disregarded this system.

University officials are said to be examining the issue and may seek clarification from the college administration. While DU has not yet issued an official statement, previous instances suggest that such actions could lead to administrative review or directives to refund the excess amount.

The university’s focus, according to insiders, is to ensure that students are not burdened with extra or unauthorised charges.

St Stephen’s and Its History of Autonomy

St Stephen’s College, though affiliated with Delhi University, enjoys a degree of autonomy in its functioning. It is governed by its own trust and has a unique admission process that includes interviews — a practice that has often sparked debate within the university system.

The current fee controversy adds to ongoing discussions about the limits of institutional independence. While autonomy allows colleges like St Stephen’s to uphold high academic standards and administrative flexibility, it must still align with university policies in key areas like fee regulation and examination procedures.

Education experts believe that greater coordination between autonomous colleges and the university administration is essential to prevent confusion and protect students’ interests.

Why the Overcharging Issue Matters

At first glance, the difference of ₹8,000 per student may seem small, but for many families, especially those relying on scholarships or financial aid, such discrepancies can cause financial strain.

The larger concern, however, is about transparency and trust. When reputed institutions like St Stephen’s, known for their credibility and legacy, face allegations of overcharging or procedural violations, it shakes public confidence in the fairness of higher education systems.

Such incidents also highlight the need for better oversight mechanisms within universities. Fee structures, once approved, should be clearly communicated and uniformly implemented. Any deviation must be justified and authorised by the affiliating body.

Voices from Students and Parents

According to students quoted in reports, the confusion around payment has led to stress among first-year enrollees and their families. Some said they were unsure whether to follow the university’s payment instructions or comply with the college’s directive.

Parents have reportedly raised questions about where the additional amount would be used and whether it would be refunded. For many, the incident underscores the importance of having transparent, university-controlled systems to prevent such disputes in the future.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Ludhiana Guest Faculty Arrears Cleared After 10 Months—127 Paid at Last

Ludhiana Guest Faculty Arrears Cleared After 10 Months—127 Paid at Last

In a welcome development for government college staff in Punjab, the state government has cleared ten months’ salary arrears for 127 guest faculty assistant professors working in and around Ludhiana. These educators, who had been waiting for their pay due since recruitment of permanent staff caused payment bottlenecks, finally received their dues following interventions by the Higher Education Department and senior officials.

I am writing about this issue because it highlights the real-life challenges faced by guest faculty who form the backbone of higher education institutions in many states. These staff members often work under uncertain conditions, yet play a vital role in teaching, mentoring and maintaining college operations. Delayed salaries can affect morale, teaching quality and personal lives. The prompt release of these arrears is a positive signal that administrative hurdles are being addressed—and that welfare of teaching staff is being taken seriously. Such stories matter because they connect policy decisions with the ground reality of our education system.

What Happened and Who Was Affected

  • Guest faculty assistant professors posted at government colleges in the Ludhiana region and elsewhere in Punjab were owed roughly ten months of salary.
  • They included faculty from approximately 25 colleges who had been waiting since the recruitment of permanent professors disrupted the honourarium disbursal process.
  • The Guest Faculty Assistant Professors United Front, a group representing these educators, welcomed the action and expressed gratitude to the Higher Education Minister and senior officials for timely resolution.

Reasons for the Salary Delay

The delay stemmed from multiple factors:

  • Recruitment of permanent professors created administrative and budgetary disruptions, affecting guest faculty payments.
  • The payment mechanism was stalled as colleges and the department adjusted to new payroll and accounting systems.
  • The guest faculty category often lacks long-term employment guarantees, making such delays more critical for their financial stability.

What the Resolution Involves

With the government releasing the pending dues, guest faculty now have relief from financial uncertainty. The key features of the resolution include:

  • Full payout of the ten months’ arrears for the 127 affected faculty members.
  • Acknowledgement of guest faculty contribution by state leadership and education officials.
  • Calls from the United Front to regularise guest faculty service or provide better job security, recognising their long term commitment to the education system.

Why This Matter for the Education Sector

Timely salary payment is not just about finances—it affects the very functioning of colleges:

  • Guest faculty may have better focus and teaching motivation when payments are current.
  • Smooth operations help colleges maintain classes, student engagement and academic standards.
  • A system where temporary staff are treated fairly sends a positive message about the value of educators and education.

What Next For Guest Faculty

While this payout marks progress, guest faculty and their representatives emphasise further needs:

  • Regularisation of services or establishing clearer contracts for those serving long-term.
  • Transparent workload and payment schedules to avoid future arrears.
  • Better integration of guest faculty in the academic planning and budgeting process of colleges.
  • Ongoing monitoring to ensure similar delays do not recur in other districts.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...