JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

Vice President Dhankhar Flags Coaching Culture as Obstacle to NEP Goals

Vice President Dhankhar Flags Coaching Culture as Obstacle to NEP Goals

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar recently raised strong concerns about how the booming coaching culture in India is becoming a major barrier to achieving the objectives set under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Speaking at a convocation ceremony, he emphasised that the growing dependence on coaching centres is not only undermining the formal education system but is also narrowing the purpose of learning itself. He highlighted the urgent need to bring the focus back on critical thinking, creativity and holistic development—key goals of the NEP.

I’m writing about this because the pressure of coaching and entrance exam preparation has become the new normal for many students, especially in urban areas. As someone who has seen how students often lose interest in learning for knowledge and focus only on clearing exams, I believe this conversation is long overdue. The NEP was introduced to reduce stress and promote diverse learning paths, but the reality on the ground seems to be moving in a different direction. By exploring what the Vice President said and the ground reality, we can reflect on where our education system is headed and whether the current coaching-driven culture truly helps our children in the long run.

Vice President’s Concerns on Coaching Culture

During his address, Vice President Dhankhar pointed out that coaching centres are increasingly dictating how students approach education. Instead of learning concepts through classroom teaching and engaging with subjects meaningfully, students are pushed into rote learning just to crack competitive exams. This trend, he said, defeats the purpose of a balanced education system as envisioned in the NEP.

He stated, “This unhealthy dependence on coaching undermines school education and lowers its credibility. It transforms education into a race for marks rather than a pursuit of knowledge.”

Why It Conflicts With NEP 2020

The National Education Policy 2020 was introduced with the vision of making education flexible, skill-based and rooted in real-life learning. Some of its core principles include:

  • Emphasis on critical thinking and problem-solving
  • Integration of vocational skills and art
  • Multilingual education
  • Reducing exam stress and high-stakes testing
  • Encouraging curiosity, creativity and application-based knowledge

However, coaching institutes often contradict these goals by focusing solely on entrance exams like NEET, JEE or CUET, where success is determined by speed and accuracy under pressure—not by understanding or innovation.

The Pressure Students Face

Across the country, lakhs of students enrol in coaching hubs in places like Kota, Hyderabad and Delhi. Many live away from families and are pushed into rigorous routines from a very young age. Mental health concerns, burnout, and even tragic incidents like student suicides have repeatedly made headlines. Parents spend lakhs of rupees in the hope of securing their child’s future, but often without asking whether the child actually wants to pursue that path.

It’s a system that rewards test performance more than interest or talent.

What Needs to Change?

To align our education system with the goals of NEP, we need some real changes, such as:

  • Strengthening school education so that students don’t feel the need for external coaching
  • Making competitive exams more balanced, with a focus on real understanding
  • Promoting alternative pathways like vocational training and skill development
  • Training teachers to implement NEP’s ideas at the grassroots level
  • Encouraging students to explore subjects without the fear of exams

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Maharashtra’s Landmark 1% Quota for Orphans: How the Policy Is Transforming Lives

Maharashtra’s Landmark 1% Quota for Orphans: How the Policy Is Transforming Lives

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has hailed the state’s 1% reservation for orphans in government jobs and educational institutions as a groundbreaking move toward social equity. Introduced in 2018, the policy was designed to give children without parental support the same opportunities available to other recognised reserved categories. Since its launch, the initiative has benefited over 800 individuals, reflecting a meaningful shift in the state’s efforts to uplift and protect one of its most vulnerable groups.

For decades, orphans struggled to fit into existing reservation categories, often being grouped under general or open categories, despite having no family, financial support or social backing. This made education and employment exceptionally difficult for them. Maharashtra’s decision to create a dedicated quota acknowledges their unique challenges and gives them a chance to build independent, dignified lives. Highlighting this initiative is important because it sets a powerful example for other states and shows how targeted policies can truly transform the lives of marginalised groups. It also helps readers understand how the quota works and why it is being praised as a milestone in social reform.

Background of the 1% Orphan Quota

The policy was introduced in 2018 after recognising that orphaned children did not fall under any existing reservation category. They were often at a disadvantage compared to others who had at least some support system. By defining orphans as a separate category in both education and government recruitment, Maharashtra became the first state in India to introduce such a quota.

Key objectives included:

  • Providing equal opportunities to children without family support
  • Reducing barriers in higher education and government employment
  • Creating a pathway for long-term financial and social stability
  • Recognising orphans as a distinct vulnerable group deserving of targeted support

How the Quota Works

The 1% reservation applies across:

  • Government jobs
  • Professional colleges
  • Higher education institutions
  • Technical and vocational courses

This means that eligible candidates are able to compete within a dedicated category, giving them access to opportunities that were previously difficult to reach.

Applicants need a legally verified “orphan certificate” issued by the state. This ensures transparency and prevents misuse of the quota.

Impact So Far

According to government data shared in the Assembly, more than 800 orphaned students and job seekers have benefitted from the quota since its implementation. The impact has been visible across multiple sectors.

Some key outcomes include:

  • Increased enrolment of orphaned students in higher education
  • Opportunities for stable government employment
  • Better access to training and skill development
  • Improved financial independence for beneficiaries
  • Reduced vulnerability to exploitation or social instability

For many young people who grew up in orphanages or state care homes, this policy has opened doors that previously seemed out of reach.

Why the Policy Is Being Praised

CM Fadnavis referred to the move as historic because it addresses a gap that existed in India’s reservation system. The praise comes from various groups for reasons such as:

  • It recognises orphans as a separate community with unique needs
  • It brings them under the protective umbrella of state support
  • It promotes true equality by considering their social disadvantages
  • It contributes to long-term social transformation
  • It provides hope and aspiration to children often overlooked in policy discussions

The quota shows that when governments tailor policies to real-life challenges, they can make measurable differences.

Challenges and Ongoing Concerns

While the policy has been celebrated, some challenges remain:

  • Awareness about the quota is still low among orphanages and NGOs
  • Documentation takes time, and not all children have early verification
  • Some candidates lack exam coaching or financial support for preparatory courses
  • There is a need for career counselling and mentorship for beneficiaries

Addressing these gaps can further strengthen the policy’s impact.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...