JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

Why India’s Elite Remain Unmoved by Rising Inequality: Insights from Surinder Jodhka

Why India’s Elite Remain Unmoved by Rising Inequality: Insights from Surinder Jodhka

Noted sociologist Surinder Jodhka has pointed out that India’s elite have increasingly grown comfortable with inequality, a situation that reflects the growing acceptance of social and economic divides in the country. He argues that while inequality in wealth, education, and opportunity has deepened over the years, those in privileged positions have normalised these gaps instead of questioning or working to reduce them. This indifference has led to a society where inequality is not just visible but widely accepted.

I am writing about this because the subject of inequality touches almost every Indian household in some way. For some, it means struggling to get basic access to education, healthcare, or fair employment. For others, especially the upper classes, it often means benefitting from structures that keep inequality alive. I feel it is important to discuss Jodhka’s observations because they highlight a worrying trend — the widening gap between rich and poor, urban and rural, and privileged and marginalised. Talking about this issue is necessary not just for academic debate but for shaping public awareness. If we fail to understand how inequality is being normalised, we risk allowing it to become permanent, making upward mobility a distant dream for millions.

Inequality and its acceptance in Indian society

Jodhka explains that inequality in India is not simply economic; it is deeply tied to caste, class, and social hierarchies. While urban centres boast luxury housing, private schools, and exclusive healthcare facilities, millions still lack basic needs. Yet, this sharp contrast has failed to disturb the conscience of the elite, who treat inequality as part of the natural order.

The role of caste and social divides

Caste continues to play a decisive role in how inequality is structured in India. Access to education, jobs, and even social respect is influenced by caste location. Reservation policies were meant to reduce these divides, but Jodhka argues that the elite often oppose such measures while ignoring their own privileges. This selective resistance shows how inequality is maintained through both silence and opposition.

Economic growth and uneven distribution

India’s rapid economic growth has created billionaires and global companies, but the benefits have not reached everyone. A small section of the population controls most of the wealth while a majority struggles with rising costs, unemployment, and limited access to resources. The elite, instead of questioning this imbalance, often see it as proof of merit or personal success, ignoring structural disadvantages faced by others.

Normalisation of privilege

One of Jodhka’s strongest points is that the elite in India no longer feel discomfort when faced with visible inequality. For example:

  • Exclusive private schools and gated communities exist side by side with underfunded government schools and informal settlements.
  • High-end healthcare is available for the rich, while the poor depend on overburdened public hospitals.
  • The top 10 percent of earners continue to expand their wealth while wages for ordinary workers stagnate.

This shows how privilege has been internalised as normal rather than seen as unfair.

Why this matters for India’s future

If inequality continues to be ignored, it will affect not just the poor but the country as a whole. A society where mobility is limited and privileges are inherited rather than earned will face rising discontent, social unrest, and reduced productivity. For India to grow inclusively, the elite need to recognise their role and responsibility in shaping a more equal society.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Odisha Government Issues New Attendance Rule: Teachers to Visit Homes if Students Stay Absent for a Week

Odisha Government Issues New Attendance Rule: Teachers to Visit Homes if Students Stay Absent for a Week

The Odisha government has introduced a new attendance-related rule for government and government-aided schools to address the growing concern of student absenteeism. As per a fresh advisory issued by the Directorate of Elementary Education, if a student remains absent from school for seven days or more, teachers will now be required to visit the student’s home and gather details about the reason for absence. The move is aimed at ensuring children do not silently drop out of the education system.

I am writing about this development because it directly affects students, parents, and teachers across the state. School absenteeism often goes unnoticed until it becomes a serious issue, especially in rural and economically weaker areas. This new rule highlights the government’s intent to actively track students and bring them back to classrooms before learning gaps widen. It also puts shared responsibility on schools to stay connected with families, not just within school walls but beyond them.

What the New Advisory Says

The advisory has been issued by the Directorate of Elementary Education and applies to all government and government-aided schools in the state.

Under the new instruction:

  • If a student is absent for one week or more, teachers must visit the student’s home
  • Teachers have to collect information on the reason for absence
  • The details must be properly recorded and reported to higher authorities
  • Schools are expected to take follow-up action to ensure the child returns to school

Why the Odisha Government Took This Step

Student absenteeism has been a persistent challenge, especially after disruptions caused by recent years. Many children stop attending school due to health issues, family responsibilities, migration, or lack of interest, and schools often come to know too late. By making home visits mandatory, the Odisha government aims to identify problems early and prevent dropouts before they become permanent.

Role of Teachers Under the New Rule

Teachers will now play a more active role beyond classroom teaching. During home visits, they are expected to:

  • Understand personal or family issues affecting attendance
  • Counsel parents and students on the importance of regular schooling
  • Encourage re-enrolment and consistent attendance
  • Coordinate with school authorities if additional support is needed

This approach focuses more on guidance and support rather than punishment.

How This Impacts Parents and Students

For parents, the rule sends a clear message that schools are serious about a child’s education. It also opens a direct communication channel between families and teachers. For students, especially those at risk of dropping out, this intervention could act as a timely push to return to school and stay on track academically.

Implementation and Monitoring

School authorities have been instructed to maintain proper records of absentee students and home visits. Block-level and district-level education officers may review compliance to ensure the advisory is being followed in both letter and spirit.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...