Popular Patna-based educator Khan Sir has appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to remove Goods and Services Tax (GST) from educational services. He argued that GST on coaching, tuition, and other learning services makes education costlier for students, especially those from middle-class and poor families. His request highlights how taxation on education directly affects affordability and access to quality learning in India.
I am writing about this because education is not a luxury but a necessity, and when taxes are imposed on something as important as learning, it widens inequality. For many students, coaching and online classes are the only way to prepare for competitive exams, yet GST increases the financial burden. Highlighting Khan Sir’s demand is important because it raises a national-level debate on whether education should be treated as a commercial service or as a basic right that should remain affordable. This issue matters not just to students but to parents, educators, and policymakers as it directly impacts the future of India’s youth.
Why Khan Sir raised this demand
Khan Sir pointed out that students already struggle with rising fees, books, and hostel expenses. Adding 18% GST on educational services further increases the cost, making it difficult for lakhs of learners to access coaching. His appeal to the Prime Minister is aimed at ensuring that education remains within the reach of every child, irrespective of financial background.
Impact of GST on students
- Coaching and tuition fees rise because of GST
- Families from weaker sections face extra burden
- Online education platforms also charge more, limiting access for rural students
Education as a right, not a service
Experts often argue that education should not be treated like any other taxable service. Removing GST will not only reduce costs but also encourage more students to pursue higher studies and competitive exams.
What this could mean for the future
If the government considers this demand, it could set a strong precedent for making education more affordable. It would also send a clear message that the nation values knowledge and is committed to empowering students without unnecessary financial hurdles.
