JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

Why Internationalisation Matters in Higher Education Today

Why Internationalisation Matters in Higher Education Today

Higher education across the world is undergoing a major transformation as universities expand beyond their national boundaries. The internationalisation of higher education includes student exchange programmes, cross-border collaborations, joint research centres, foreign campuses, global curriculum development and the mobility of faculty. In today’s interconnected world, universities are no longer limited to promoting local knowledge alone. They are becoming global knowledge hubs, preparing students for an increasingly competitive and diverse global workforce.

A degree today is not only a certificate of academic learning but also a reflection of how adaptable, innovative and aware a student is of international perspectives. Countries use education to shape global influence, build soft power and strengthen economic relationships. Students benefit from research opportunities, diverse cultural learning and international networking. However, this movement also raises concerns about affordability, brain drain and unequal access. Understanding how global education fits within the present geopolitical and economic order helps us decide whether these changes create opportunities for everyone or only for a privileged few.

What Internationalisation Means for Universities

Globalisation has pushed universities to compete and collaborate simultaneously. Institutions today aim to:

  • Attract international students and faculty
  • Develop joint degree programmes with foreign universities
  • Create research partnerships across borders
  • Set up offshore campuses in other countries
  • Offer internationally relevant curriculum and skill-based learning

This helps institutions build global reputation and stay academically competitive.

Higher Education as a Soft Power Tool

Countries use education to build diplomatic ties and global influence. When students study abroad, they often:

  • Build long-lasting cultural and economic relations
  • Carry forward international friendships and networks
  • Promote a positive image of the host country
  • Create future collaborations in trade, technology and governance

For example, countries like Australia, Canada, the UK and the United States attract students not just for academic revenue, but also to strengthen their global engagement strategies.

Research Collaboration and Knowledge Exchange

Internationalisation has led to collaborative research in fields like:

  • Climate change
  • Biotechnology and healthcare
  • Data science and artificial intelligence
  • Agriculture and food security
  • Peace studies and global policy

Shared research projects pool global talent, reduce research costs, and accelerate scientific innovation. This is especially important in areas where global cooperation is essential.

The Concern of Brain Drain

While internationalisation opens doors, it also leads to skilled workers migrating permanently to developed nations. This creates:

  • Loss of talent in developing countries
  • Shortage of skilled professionals in critical sectors
  • Economic imbalance in the global knowledge economy

To counter this, many countries are focusing on improving domestic universities, attracting foreign faculty and creating research incentives within their borders.

Making Global Education Accessible

Internationalisation must not widen inequality. To make it fair, governments and universities need to invest in:

  • Affordable exchange programmes
  • International scholarship schemes
  • Virtual learning partnerships
  • Joint degrees without mandatory travel
  • Community-based global learning models

The goal should be to provide global exposure without making it unaffordable for disadvantaged students.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Maharashtra College Teachers Seek Higher Retirement Age, Urge UGC to Act

Maharashtra College Teachers Seek Higher Retirement Age, Urge UGC to Act

Teachers from colleges across Maharashtra have urged the University Grants Commission to raise the retirement age for teaching faculty from the current 60 years to 65 years. The demand has been made by teachers’ associations who argue that experienced educators are being forced to retire too early, even as colleges continue to face staff shortages. They believe extending the retirement age will help retain academic expertise and improve teaching quality in higher education institutions.

I am writing about this issue because it affects not just teachers, but also students and the overall higher education system. At a time when universities are struggling with vacant posts and delayed recruitments, losing senior faculty creates gaps in teaching, research, and mentorship. The demand also raises a larger question about how India values experience in academia and whether policy needs to evolve with changing life expectancy and professional capability.

What Maharashtra Teachers Are Demanding

Teachers’ bodies have formally requested UGC to revise the retirement age for college and university teachers to 65 years, bringing it in line with several central institutions. They argue that many educators remain academically active and physically fit well beyond 60.

According to them, forcing retirement at 60 leads to a loss of institutional memory and teaching continuity.

Why Teachers Want the Age Limit Raised

Teachers say the demand is based on practical realities. Many colleges face:

  • Acute shortage of qualified faculty
  • Delays in permanent recruitment
  • Heavy teaching loads on existing staff

Extending the retirement age would offer immediate relief without additional recruitment costs.

Comparison with Central Institutions

In several central universities and institutions, teachers are allowed to work up to 65 years, and in some cases even longer through re-employment. Maharashtra teachers feel this creates inequality between state and central institutions.

They believe a uniform retirement policy across the country would be fairer and more effective.

Impact on Students and Academic Quality

Senior teachers often play a key role in mentoring young faculty, guiding research scholars, and maintaining academic standards. Their early retirement disrupts this balance and places extra pressure on junior staff.

Students, especially at postgraduate and research levels, are among the biggest losers.

Concerns About Youth Employment

Some critics argue that extending retirement age could limit opportunities for younger aspirants. Teachers’ associations counter this by saying vacant posts already exist and recruitment processes are slow, so extending service will not block new jobs.

They stress that experience and new talent should coexist.

What UGC’s Role Will Be

UGC has the authority to frame regulations related to service conditions in higher education. Any change in retirement age would require policy review and coordination with state governments.

Teachers are hopeful that the commission will consider the request seriously.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...