JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

Maharashtra Mandates ‘Disha’ App in Special Schools to Standardise Special Education

Maharashtra Mandates ‘Disha’ App in Special Schools to Standardise Special Education

In a significant move to strengthen education for students with intellectual disabilities, the state Department of Disability Welfare has announced that the ‘Disha’ app will now be compulsory in all special schools. The decision mandates the uniform adoption of the Disha special curriculum, digital learning portal, and assessment system across the state.

By making the platform mandatory, the department aims to ensure consistent teaching methods, standardised evaluations, and equal learning opportunities for students in special schools, irrespective of their location or the institution’s management. The move is expected to improve quality, accountability, and continuity in special education services statewide.

I am writing about this development because special education often suffers from uneven implementation and lack of standard benchmarks. When different schools follow different methods, students are the ones who lose out. Making a common digital curriculum and evaluation system mandatory is a significant policy shift. It directly affects students, teachers, parents, and school administrators, and signals the government’s intent to bring structure, accountability, and continuity into special education.

What Is the ‘Disha’ App and Curriculum

The Disha app is a specially designed digital platform developed for students with intellectual disabilities. It includes a structured curriculum, teaching tools, and an evaluation framework aligned with the learning needs of special children.

The platform helps teachers track student progress in a systematic way and ensures that learning goals are clearly defined and measurable.

Why the State Made Disha Mandatory

According to the disability welfare department, the lack of a uniform curriculum across special schools has led to gaps in learning outcomes. Some schools follow advanced methods, while others struggle with outdated practices.

Announcing the decision, Tukaram Mundhe, secretary of the disability welfare department, said the Disha system would help bring “uniformity and continuity into special education while supporting the overall development of students”.

How This Will Help Students

With the Disha system in place, students across the state will now follow a common learning structure suited to their abilities. This ensures smoother academic progression, especially for students who move between schools or districts.

Standardised evaluation will also help identify learning gaps early and provide targeted support.

Impact on Teachers and Special Schools

Teachers will now receive a clear framework for lesson planning, assessment, and reporting. This reduces confusion and improves teaching quality. Schools will also be accountable for following the prescribed curriculum and updating student progress on the portal.

While some schools may need time to adapt, the long-term goal is better coordination and quality control.

Concerns and Challenges on the Ground

Some educators have raised concerns about training, digital access, and infrastructure, especially in smaller or rural special schools. Successful implementation will depend on proper teacher training, technical support, and continuous monitoring by authorities.

Without these, the system risks becoming a formality rather than a meaningful reform.

Why Uniformity Matters in Special Education

Special education requires consistency more than flexibility. Students with intellectual disabilities benefit from structured routines, clear goals, and continuity in teaching methods. A common curriculum helps ensure that every child, irrespective of school, receives comparable support and opportunities.

This move aligns policy with actual learning needs.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Maharashtra College Teachers Seek Higher Retirement Age, Urge UGC to Act

Maharashtra College Teachers Seek Higher Retirement Age, Urge UGC to Act

Teachers from colleges across Maharashtra have urged the University Grants Commission to raise the retirement age for teaching faculty from the current 60 years to 65 years. The demand has been made by teachers’ associations who argue that experienced educators are being forced to retire too early, even as colleges continue to face staff shortages. They believe extending the retirement age will help retain academic expertise and improve teaching quality in higher education institutions.

I am writing about this issue because it affects not just teachers, but also students and the overall higher education system. At a time when universities are struggling with vacant posts and delayed recruitments, losing senior faculty creates gaps in teaching, research, and mentorship. The demand also raises a larger question about how India values experience in academia and whether policy needs to evolve with changing life expectancy and professional capability.

What Maharashtra Teachers Are Demanding

Teachers’ bodies have formally requested UGC to revise the retirement age for college and university teachers to 65 years, bringing it in line with several central institutions. They argue that many educators remain academically active and physically fit well beyond 60.

According to them, forcing retirement at 60 leads to a loss of institutional memory and teaching continuity.

Why Teachers Want the Age Limit Raised

Teachers say the demand is based on practical realities. Many colleges face:

  • Acute shortage of qualified faculty
  • Delays in permanent recruitment
  • Heavy teaching loads on existing staff

Extending the retirement age would offer immediate relief without additional recruitment costs.

Comparison with Central Institutions

In several central universities and institutions, teachers are allowed to work up to 65 years, and in some cases even longer through re-employment. Maharashtra teachers feel this creates inequality between state and central institutions.

They believe a uniform retirement policy across the country would be fairer and more effective.

Impact on Students and Academic Quality

Senior teachers often play a key role in mentoring young faculty, guiding research scholars, and maintaining academic standards. Their early retirement disrupts this balance and places extra pressure on junior staff.

Students, especially at postgraduate and research levels, are among the biggest losers.

Concerns About Youth Employment

Some critics argue that extending retirement age could limit opportunities for younger aspirants. Teachers’ associations counter this by saying vacant posts already exist and recruitment processes are slow, so extending service will not block new jobs.

They stress that experience and new talent should coexist.

What UGC’s Role Will Be

UGC has the authority to frame regulations related to service conditions in higher education. Any change in retirement age would require policy review and coordination with state governments.

Teachers are hopeful that the commission will consider the request seriously.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...