JOIN WHATSAPP
STORIES

SSC–HSC Exam CCTV Rule Sparks Funding Debate as Maharashtra Schools Seek Government Support

SSC–HSC Exam CCTV Rule Sparks Funding Debate as Maharashtra Schools Seek Government Support

With the SSC and HSC board examinations approaching, schools and junior colleges selected as examination centres have been directed to strengthen their infrastructure, including the mandatory installation of CCTV cameras in every classroom. The instruction comes through a recent government circular issued ahead of the examinations conducted by the Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education.

While the measure is intended to enhance monitoring and ensure transparency during the exams, it has raised concerns among school authorities. Many institutions, particularly government and aided schools, have questioned the decision due to uncertainty over who will fund these compulsory infrastructure upgrades, leading to growing unease within the education community.

I am writing about this issue because it directly affects thousands of schools, teachers, and students across Maharashtra. Exam integrity is important, but so is practical implementation. Many schools, especially government-run and aided institutions, operate on tight budgets. Without clear funding support or timelines, the directive risks becoming a financial burden rather than a meaningful reform. This debate highlights the gap that often exists between policy decisions and ground realities.

What the Government Circular Says

The circular instructs all SSC and HSC examination centres to ensure adequate surveillance arrangements. This includes installing functional CCTV cameras in every examination classroom to monitor exams in real time and discourage malpractices.

Education officials believe this step will strengthen transparency and accountability during board examinations.

Why Schools Are Raising Objections

Schools have pointed out that installing CCTV cameras across multiple classrooms involves significant expenditure. Apart from cameras, there are costs related to wiring, storage systems, maintenance, and electricity.

Government and aided schools say they do not have separate funds earmarked for such sudden infrastructure upgrades, making compliance difficult without financial assistance.

Financial Burden on Government and Aided Institutions

Private unaided schools may manage the cost internally, but government and aided schools depend largely on grants. School managements argue that asking them to arrange funds at short notice is unrealistic.

They are demanding clarity on whether the government will reimburse costs or provide direct funding support for CCTV installation.

Concerns About Timeline and Implementation

Another concern raised by schools is the short timeframe available before examinations begin. Procuring equipment, completing installation, and ensuring systems are functional requires time and technical support.

Without a phased plan, schools fear last-minute pressure and uneven implementation across centres.

Purpose Behind CCTV Monitoring in Exams

The government’s intention behind CCTV surveillance is to prevent copying, impersonation, and other unfair practices. Officials believe that visible monitoring acts as a deterrent and helps maintain the credibility of board exams.

However, schools stress that enforcement should be balanced with feasibility.

What Schools Are Demanding

School associations are urging the government to:

  • Clearly specify who will fund the CCTV installation
  • Provide grants or reimbursements to eligible schools
  • Issue standard technical guidelines
  • Allow sufficient time for compliance

They say cooperation will improve if responsibilities are clearly defined.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Maharashtra College Teachers Seek Higher Retirement Age, Urge UGC to Act

Maharashtra College Teachers Seek Higher Retirement Age, Urge UGC to Act

Teachers from colleges across Maharashtra have urged the University Grants Commission to raise the retirement age for teaching faculty from the current 60 years to 65 years. The demand has been made by teachers’ associations who argue that experienced educators are being forced to retire too early, even as colleges continue to face staff shortages. They believe extending the retirement age will help retain academic expertise and improve teaching quality in higher education institutions.

I am writing about this issue because it affects not just teachers, but also students and the overall higher education system. At a time when universities are struggling with vacant posts and delayed recruitments, losing senior faculty creates gaps in teaching, research, and mentorship. The demand also raises a larger question about how India values experience in academia and whether policy needs to evolve with changing life expectancy and professional capability.

What Maharashtra Teachers Are Demanding

Teachers’ bodies have formally requested UGC to revise the retirement age for college and university teachers to 65 years, bringing it in line with several central institutions. They argue that many educators remain academically active and physically fit well beyond 60.

According to them, forcing retirement at 60 leads to a loss of institutional memory and teaching continuity.

Why Teachers Want the Age Limit Raised

Teachers say the demand is based on practical realities. Many colleges face:

  • Acute shortage of qualified faculty
  • Delays in permanent recruitment
  • Heavy teaching loads on existing staff

Extending the retirement age would offer immediate relief without additional recruitment costs.

Comparison with Central Institutions

In several central universities and institutions, teachers are allowed to work up to 65 years, and in some cases even longer through re-employment. Maharashtra teachers feel this creates inequality between state and central institutions.

They believe a uniform retirement policy across the country would be fairer and more effective.

Impact on Students and Academic Quality

Senior teachers often play a key role in mentoring young faculty, guiding research scholars, and maintaining academic standards. Their early retirement disrupts this balance and places extra pressure on junior staff.

Students, especially at postgraduate and research levels, are among the biggest losers.

Concerns About Youth Employment

Some critics argue that extending retirement age could limit opportunities for younger aspirants. Teachers’ associations counter this by saying vacant posts already exist and recruitment processes are slow, so extending service will not block new jobs.

They stress that experience and new talent should coexist.

What UGC’s Role Will Be

UGC has the authority to frame regulations related to service conditions in higher education. Any change in retirement age would require policy review and coordination with state governments.

Teachers are hopeful that the commission will consider the request seriously.

Leave a Comment

End of Article

Loading more posts...