The Bihar government recently decided to appoint principals in its government schools through a lottery system instead of merit-based selection. While the intention behind this move may be to speed up appointments or prevent corruption, assigning leadership roles in education randomly raises serious questions. Can we afford to leave the future of thousands of students in the hands of chance instead of competence? Bihar’s education system is already struggling with teacher shortages, poor learning outcomes, and administrative gaps. This policy risks making things worse, not better.

I am writing about this because education in Bihar is not just a regional concern. It represents a deeper national challenge—of how we treat public education, especially in poorer states. Leadership in schools is not just about filling vacancies. A principal shapes the learning environment, ensures discipline, motivates teachers, and builds a sense of direction. Appointing someone randomly without assessing their capability or vision defeats the entire purpose of school leadership. As someone who believes in education reform from the ground up, I feel it’s important to speak against policies that may appear neutral but are actually harmful in practice.

What Is Bihar Trying to Do with Lottery-Based Appointments?

The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) recently conducted exams to recruit principals for government secondary and higher secondary schools. However, when it came time to assign them to schools, the state chose to do so through a lottery. According to officials, this was done to avoid accusations of bias, bribery, or manipulation in the placement process.

But what may appear as a fair and transparent method is actually flawed. Every school has different needs. Assigning someone through random selection assumes that all schools are the same and that all selected principals have the same capacity. That is far from the truth.

Why School Leadership Cannot Be Left to Chance

• Context Matters: A school in a remote village facing infrastructure issues needs a very different kind of leader compared to a school in a small town where dropout rates are high due to socio-economic reasons. Matching the right principal to the right school can lead to real change. A lottery ignores this entirely.
• Merit and Specialisation: If someone has experience working in tribal areas or in girl-child education, shouldn’t that be taken into account when placing them? The lottery doesn’t care.
• Demotivation: Many candidates who worked hard for years to prepare for the BPSC exam may end up posted in locations where they are neither effective nor motivated. This can lower morale and performance.

A System Already Under Stress

Let’s not forget that Bihar’s education system is already under enormous pressure:

• Student-teacher ratios are often poor
• Teacher absenteeism is a chronic problem
• Infrastructure is missing in many schools—no toilets, drinking water, or proper classrooms
• Learning outcomes remain among the lowest in the country as per NAS and ASER reports

In such a situation, strong school leadership could have been a turning point. A principal who knows how to manage people, connect with the local community, and support teachers can transform even a resource-poor school. But assigning them through lottery is a missed opportunity.

Alternatives Bihar Could Consider

Instead of lotteries, Bihar could:

• Use a needs-based matching system where school requirements and principal strengths are matched
• Create a transparent algorithm that accounts for seniority, performance, location preference, and school need
• Involve community feedback and district-level performance metrics
• Offer training and support to principals before and after placement